Abstract

In this paper, we present a new form of “special relativity” (BSR), which is isomorphic to Einstein’s “special relativity” (ESR). This in turn proves the non-uniqueness of Einstein’s “special relativity” and implies the inconclusiveness of so-called “relativistic physics”. This work presents new results of principal significance for the foundations of physics and practical results for high energy physics, deep space astrophysics, and cosmology as well. The entire exposition is done within the formalism of the Lorentz SL(2C) group acting via isometries on real 3-dimensional Lobachevskian (hyperbolic) spaces L3 regarded as quotients SL(2C)/SU(2). We show via direct calculations that both ESR and BSR are parametric maps from Lobachevskian into Euclidean space, namely a gnomonic (central) map in the case of ESR, and a stereographic map in the case of BSR. Such an identification allows us to link these maps to relevant models of Lobachevskian geometry. Thus, we identify ESR as the physical realization of the Beltrami-Klein (non-conformal) model, and BSR as the physical realization of the Poincare (conformal) model of Lobachevskian geometry. Although we focus our discussion on ball models of Lobachevskian geometry, our method is quite general, and for instance, may be applied to the half-space model of Lobachevskian geometry with appropriate “Lorentz group” acting via isometries on (positive) half space, resulting yet in another “special relativity” isomorphic with ESR and BSR. By using the notion of a homotopy of maps, the identification of “special relativities” as maps from Lobachevskian into Euclidean space allows us to justify the existence of an uncountable infinity of hybrid “special relativities” and consequently an uncountable infinity of “relativistic physics” built upon them. This is another new result in physics and it states that so called “relativistic physics” is unique only up to a homotopy. Finally, we show that “paradoxes” of “special relativities” in either ESR or BSR are simply common distortions of maps between non-isometric spaces. The entire exposition is kept at elementary level accessible to majority of students in physics and/or engineering.

Highlights

  • The work we present here deals with maps

  • 16 Comparing Formulas (55) and (56) resulting from Lorentz transformations with Formulas (14) and (17) which we derived from the gnomonic projection from hyperboloids, we see that they are identical

  • It seems that at the time he introduced Einstein’s “special relativity” (ESR), Einstein was not familiar with the work of Lobachevski on non-Euclidean geometry; he deduced the correct formula for addition of velocities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The work we present here deals with maps. The meaning of a map used in mathematics and physics is slightly different; its essence is the same. These distortions are independent of informational noise, but they do depend on the particular map with which the experimental data are interpreted This results in non-unique quantitative interpretations of physical phenomena. The non-uniqueness of such interpretations is inherently present in High Energy (high relative velocities) Physics (HEP), and they arise naturally in maps of Lobachevskian negatively curved spaces into a Euclidean flat space. Since 1905, it has been generally accepted that phenomena occurring at high relative velocities (with respect to c) are modeled in unique way (i.e. in the only way possible) by Einstein’s “special relativity” Such beliefs resulted in the confidence that the numerical information represented by data gained from ESR reflects the truth about the Nature. As we will later see, these distortions in the context of “special relativity” are misunderstood as real phenomena and are represented by variety of “paradoxes”

Distortions of Data Due to Maps between Non-Isometric Spaces
Conclusion
Homotopy and an Infinity of Maps
Representation of Lobachevskian Geometry as a 3-Dim
Advantages and Generality of Our Approach
Isomorphism between ESR and BSR “Special Relativities”
Paradoxes as Distortions of Maps between Non-Isometric Spaces
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call