Non Type-1 Brugada pattern, diagnostic yield of 5 ECG criteria in a young adult cohort

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Distinguishing between non-Type 1 Brugada pattern (non-T1BrP) and an athlete's ECG remains challenging and may have important prognostic implications. We aimed to study prevalence and the diagnostic yield of experts and non-experts for the electrocardiographic non-T1BrP criteria in the young adults from the Sudden Cardiac Death-Screening Of risk factorS (SCD-SOS) cohort. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study in which we reviewed 14662 ECGs of SCD-SOS survey participants and selected 2494 that presented a rSr'-pattern in V1-V2. Among these, 98 were classified by experts in hereditary arrhythmic syndromes for the presence of non-T1BrP and by non-experts who performed manual measurements of the diagnostic criteria based on triangle formed by r'-wave. We estimated intra and interobserver concordance for each criterion, and used logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and C-statistics for diagnostic accuracy and definition of the most appropriate cut-off values. Results We detected a rSr'-pattern in V1-V2 in 17% of the individuals and found that it was associated with higher PQ and QTc intervals, male gender and lower BMI. The manual measurements of non-T1BrP criteria were reproducible: we had high intraobserver concordance coefficients (CC) ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 (except for d(B) that had 0.66), but interobserver CC were lower (0.45–0.68). The measurements performed were highly correlated with non-T1BrP diagnosis and the criteria with higher discriminatory capacity were the distance d(B) (AUC 0.77; 95% CI0.69–0.84) and the degree of ST-ascent (AUC 0.79; 95% CI 0.72–0.86). The cut-offs defined by other authors had very low sensitivity (8–12%), despite high specificity (98%), so we defined new cut-offs: d(A) ≥2mm, d(B) ≥1.25mm, d(B)/h ≥0.38, β-angle ≥19° and ST-ascent ≥1mm. The addition of the degree of ST-ascent to a model with these 4 parameters presented an increase in C-statistics from 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68–0.86) to 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75–0.91) for the diagnosis of non-T1BrP by an expert in Sudden Arrhythmic Death and Channelopathies. Conclusion A rSr'-pattern in precordial leads V1-V2 is a frequent finding and the detection of non-T1BrP by using the aforementioned 5 measurements is reproducible and accurate. In this study, we describe new cut-off values that may help untrained clinicians to identify young individuals who should be referred for provocative drug testing for Brugada Syndrome. Accuracy of non-T1 BrP criteria Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None