Abstract

Background: Because of doubts about the sufficiency of convention indicators to continually gauge innovative outcomes at the firm level, a burgeoning stream of scholars has shifted their empirical efforts to the theoretical development of non-technical innovations. Aim: This study investigates the contribution of non-technical, innovative, entrepreneurial and marketing endeavours to the development of superior entrepreneurship through two types of firm capabilities. Setting: Over several stages, a structured questionnaire form was formulated. Firstly, an extensive review of previous similar research was performed to identify the adoptable scale items. After adjusting the scales based on the feedback from the pre-testers, the final questionnaire comprised 55 items measured on a five-point Likert-type scale. Methods: A total of 155 valid questionnaires, with the inclusion of late-responses, were obtained and this represented a response rate of 22%. Particularly, a conceptual model connecting market orientation, organisational learning, non-technical innovation and entrepreneurship was tested using partial least square path modelling. Results: In considering the criticality of innovation as the fulcrum of service-based delivery, our model advances the existing empirical approaches with a more intangible dimensionality of innovative efforts. Overall, the model distinguishes that small service firms engaging in dual modes of non-technical innovation strategically nurture intangible capabilities, which in turn provides them with enduring performance outcomes in outperforming competitors. Conclusion: The findings could assist small firms in accomplishing new value creation via non-technical innovations.

Highlights

  • For many years, research on innovation has tended to endorse a technical-centred advancement (Davies, Manning & Söderlund 2018; Drejer 2004; Slaughter 2000)

  • A strong and significant positive effect exists between market orientation (MO) and organisational learning (OL) (β = 0.76, t = 19.708), supporting H3

  • No support is indicated for the hypothesised path of OL and entrepreneurship (H2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research on innovation has tended to endorse a technical-centred advancement (Davies, Manning & Söderlund 2018; Drejer 2004; Slaughter 2000). Due to doubts about the sufficiency of these convention indicators to continually gauge the innovative outcomes at the firm level, a burgeoning stream of scholars has shifted their empirical efforts to the theoretical developing of non-technical innovations (Armbruster et al 2006; Camison & Villar-Lopez 2014; Caroli & Van Reenen 2001; Evangelista & Vezzani 2010; Gallego & Rubalcaba 2012; Greenan 2003; Hamel 2006; Mol & Birkinshaw 2009; Naidoo 2010; OECD 2005; Shergill & Nargundkar 2005) These findings reported that non-technical innovation, which suggests advantage within organisational or managerial and marketing innovations, can harness the extant research stream with an enhanced understanding of the innovative dynamism and the performance consequences of engagement (Iliescu & Ciocan 2017; Martínez-Román, Tamayo & Gamero 2017; Nyström, Nilsson & Lind 2016). Because of doubts about the sufficiency of convention indicators to continually gauge innovative outcomes at the firm level, a burgeoning stream of scholars has shifted their empirical efforts to the theoretical development of non-technical innovations

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call