Abstract

The objective of present study was to propose a new classification for acute MPFL injury, which can help choose optimal treatment method for certain injury type. Eighty-five patients with acute patellar dislocation treated non-surgically were retrospectively reviewed. They were assigned into two groups according to the newly introduced classification scheme, which classified MPFL injury into three types: injury in overlap region, injury in non-overlap region and combined injury of both regions. For study purpose, patients with combined injury were not included. Of 85 patients, 33 were in the overlap-region group (Group 1) and 52 in the non-overlap-region group (Group 2). Clinical patellar instability rate and patellofemoral score were measured and recorded at 2-year follow-up. The patellar instability rate was 15.2% in Group 1 and 38.5% in Group 2, with statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.022). The mean visual analogue scale for Group 1 and Group 2 was 15.6 points and 28.3 points, respectively (P=0.026). The mean Kujala score was 91.1 points and 82.6 points (P=0.009), with a good or excellent subjective result recorded for 27 of 33 patients (81.8%) in Group 1 compared with 30 of 52 patients (57.7%) in Group 2 (P=0.021). Non-surgical treatment achieves better clinical outcomes with respect to a lower patellar instability rate and better subjective function for the overlap-region injury of MPFL than for the non-overlap-region injury, and can be considered as treatment of choice for overlap-region injury of MPFL. The optimal choice for the non-overlap-region injury still requires further researches. Therapeutic, Level IV.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.