Abstract

Decoding of aberrant mRNAs leads to unproductive ribosome stalling and sequestration of components of the translation machinery. Bacteria have evolved three seemingly independent pathways to resolve stalled translation complexes. The trans-translation process, orchestrated by the hybrid transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) and its essential protein co-factor, small protein B (SmpB), is the principal translation quality control system for rescuing unproductively stalled ribosomes. Two specialized alternative rescue pathways, coordinated by ArfA and ArfB, have been recently discovered. The SmpB-tmRNA mediated trans-translation pathway, in addition to re-mobilizing stalled translation complexes, co-translationally appends a degradation tag to the associated nascent polypeptides, marking them for proteolysis by various cellular proteases. Another unique feature of trans-translation, not shared by the alternative rescue pathways, is the facility to recruit ribonuclease R (RNase R) for targeted degradation of non-stop mRNAs, thus preventing further futile cycles of translation. The distinct C-terminal lysine-rich (K-rich) domain of RNase R is essential for its recruitment to stalled ribosomes. To gain new insights into the structure and function of RNase R, we investigated its global architecture, the spatial arrangement of its distinct domains, and the identities of key functional residues in its unique K-rich domain. Small-angle X-ray scattering models of RNase R reveal a tri-lobed structure with flexible N- and C-terminal domains, and suggest intimate contacts between the K-rich domain and the catalytic core of the enzyme. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the K-rich domain, in the region spanning residues 735 and 750, has uncovered the precise amino acid determinants required for the productive engagement of RNase R on tmRNA-rescued ribosomes. Theses analyses demonstrate that alanine substitution of conserved residues E740 and K741result in profound defects, not only in the recruitment of RNase R to rescued ribosomes but also in the targeted decay of non-stop mRNAs. Additionally, an RNase R variant with alanine substitution at residues K749 and K750 exhibits extensive defects in ribosome enrichment and non-stop mRNA decay. In contrast, alanine substitution of additional conserved residues in this region has no effect on the known functions of RNase R. In vitro RNA degradation assays demonstrate that the consequential substitutions (RNase RE740A/K741A and RNase RK749A/K750A) do not affect the ability of the enzyme to degrade structured RNAs, indicating that the observed defect is specific to the trans-translation related activities of RNase R. Taken together, these findings shed new light on the global architecture of RNase R and provide new details of how this versatile RNase effectuates non-stop mRNA decay on tmRNA-rescued ribosomes.

Highlights

  • Controlling mRNA stability is one of the key means of posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression

  • We recently demonstrated that the K-rich C-terminal domain of ribonuclease R (RNase R) is required for the transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA)-mediated ribosome enrichment and non-stop mRNA decay activities of RNase R (Ge et al, 2010)

  • The I-TASSER models predicted that the unique Nand C-terminal domains, which do not share significant homology to any known structures, flank the core catalytic domain of RNase R

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Controlling mRNA stability is one of the key means of posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. Translating ribosomes are thought to sterically hinder ribonucleases from accessing cleavage sites present in mRNAs, leading to their increased stability (Carpousis, 2007; Bouvier and Carpousis, 2011). The stability of defective or non-stop mRNAs, which promote the accumulation of unproductively stalled ribosomes, is dramatically reduced. A universally conserved ribosome rescue mechanism called transtranslation facilitates the selective increase in non-stop mRNA decay (Karzai et al, 2000; Withey and Friedman, 2003; Dulebohn et al, 2007; Keiler, 2008; Wower et al, 2008; Hayes and Keiler, 2010; Barends et al, 2011).

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.