Abstract
The EMSLAB data set (Jones et al., 1989) has been processed using time-frequency methods to estimate the apparent resistivities and phases. When compared to the results from traditional methods, the time-frequency analysis has produced different apparent resistivity estimates for the noisier component, while the phases and the apparent resistivity estimates for the component with the stronger signal are very similar. This is consistent with the bias being due to nonstationary effects, and could indicate that this type of analysis will significantly improve the quality of magnetotelluric data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
