Abstract

It is controversial whether non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the elderly constitutes a distinct clinico-biological entity compared to younger counterparts. As reported data are scant and discordant, we sought to analyze retrospectively the medical records of Hellenic NSCLC patients aged >70 years and compare them with those of age (70-45 years) and younger (<45 years) patients. Records were abstracted from the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HECOG) cancer registry database. Presentation, management and outcome data of 417 elderly patients aged ≥70, 1374 age 70-45 years old and 115 patients aged ≤45 years old with histologically confirmed NSCLC managed from 1989 until 2004 were retrieved and compared. Elderly patients differed significantly in terms of presence of symptoms (p<0.001), including thoracic pain(p=0.003), dyspnea (p<0.001), cough (p<0.001) and fatigue (p≥1), eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 2-3 (p≥1), and histological type (more commonly diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (p<0.002) and less frequently with adenocarcinoma). Although elderly patients had significantly higher rates of PS 2-3, they had significantly better median time to disease progression (TTP) com-pared to the younger counterpart (6.4 versus 4.3 months p=0.047). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between elderly and young patients (median OS11.8 versus 11.5 months; p=0.6), but platinum-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy were variables associated favorably with TTP and survival in the elderly. this large retrospective series presents strong evidence that NSCLC constitutes a similar clinico-pathologic entity in elderly and young individuals with discretely differing biological behavior and that elderly symptomatic patients should be considered for effectiveanticancer treatment whenever possible.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call