Abstract
In the case of a gyroscope including a cylindrical fluid-filled cavity, the classic Poinsot's coning motion can become unstable. For certain values of the solid inertia ratio, the coning angle opens under the effect of the hydrodynamic torque. The coupled dynamics of such a non-solid system is ruled by four dimensionless numbers: the small viscous parameter ε = Re−1/2 (where Re denotes the Reynolds number), the fluid–solid inertia ratio κ which quantifies the proportion of liquid relative to the total mass of the gyroscope, the solid inertia ratio σ and the aspect ratio h of the cylindrical cavity. The calculation of the hydrodynamic torque on the solid part of the gyroscope requires the preliminary evaluation of the possibly resonant flow inside the cavity. The hydrodynamic scaling used to derive such a flow essentially depends on the relative values of κ and ε. For small values of the ratio /ε (compared to 1), Gans derived an expression of the growth rate of the coning angle. The principles of Gans' approach (Gans, AIAA J., vol. 22, 1984, pp. 1465–1471) are briefly recalled but the details of the whole calculation are not given. At the opposite limit, that is for large values of /ε, the dominating flow is given by a linear inviscid theory. In order to take account of viscous effects, we propose a direct method involving an exhaustive calculation of the flow at order ε. We show that the deviations from Stewartson's inviscid theory (Stewartson, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 5, 1958, p. 577) do not originate from the viscous shear at the walls but rather from the bulk pressure at order ε related to the Ekman suction. Physical contents of Wedemeyer's heuristic theory (Wedemeyer, BRL Report N 1325, 1966) are analysed in the view of our analytical results. The latter are tested numerically in a large range of parameters. Complete Navier–Stokes (NS) equations are solved in the cavity. The hydrodynamic torque obtained by numerical integration of the stress is used as a forcing term in the coupled fluid–solid equations. Numerical results and analytical predictions show a fairly good quantitative agreement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.