“Non-Q wave,” alias “nontransmural,” myocardial infarction: A specific entity

Abstract

Although Q wave and non-Q wave MI are often referred to as “transmural” and “nontransmural,” there is no anatomic evidence to justify this distinction. Nevertheless, a distinction is important, because the two entities have a different prognosis. At the present time, between 25% and 35% of MIs are non-Q wave. They are frequently observed in patients with previous coronary events. They occur in a relatively older population and involve a slightly higher proportion of women than do Q wave MIs. The degree of cardiac damage is less, reflected by a smaller rise in enzyme level and less impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction; early reperfusion may occur, after spontaneous thrombolysis or resolution of coronary spasm. The immediate mortality rate is half that of Q wave MI but identical in the long term. Reinfarction and angina are more frequent because of a peri-infarction zone of ischemia maintained by a high-grade coronary stenosis and inadequate collateral circulation. Early characterization of those MIs likely to progress is important. Diltiazem seems effective in this context if given between 24 and 72 hours of the onset of the event. Other therapeutic approaches need further assessment.