Abstract

Abstract A few final documents adopted by the Review Conferences of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (‘NPT’) include important references to nuclear disarmament and to Article VI of the NPT. It is frequently assumed or claimed that these references amount to subsequent agreements as to the interpretation of Article VI. However, such a view is difficult to maintain. With the help of the 2018 Draft Conclusions on subsequent agreements and practice, this article seeks to establish two conditions that such final documents ought to satisfy if they are to be treated as subsequent agreements under Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (‘VCLT’). The analysis suggests that the final documents in question do not satisfy such conditions. Based on this evaluation, the article also explores other theoretical frameworks both within and without treaty interpretation rules, that can adequately take into account the final documents of the NPT Review Conferences in discussing nuclear disarmament in international law.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.