Non-parametric tests of real exchange rates in the post-Bretton Woods era

Abstract

This paper examines the mean-reverting property of real exchange rates. Earlier studies have generally not been able to reject the null hypothesis of a unit-root in real exchange rates, especially for the post-Bretton Woods floating period. The results imply that long-run purchasing power parity does not hold. More recent studies, especially those using panel unit-root tests or nonlinear time series models, have found more favorable results, however. But the results from these recent studies are far from conclusive. Consistent individual country time series evidence that supports long-run purchasing power parity continues to be scarce. In this paper, we test for long memory using (Lo’s in Econometrica 59:1279–1313, 1991) the modified rescaled range test, and the rescaled variance test of Giraitis et al. (J Econ 112:265–294, 2003a). Our testing procedure provides a non-parametric alternative to the parametric tests commonly used in this literature. Our data set consists of monthly observations from April 1973 to April 2001 of the G-6 countries (excluding the US) in the OECD. Using the modified rescaled range test, we find only 2 cases out of 15 where the null hypothesis of a unit-root with short-term dependence could be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis of long-term dependence and none using the rescaled variance test. Our results therefore do not provide strong empirical support for the stationarity of real exchange rates.