Abstract

The present study compared the cerebral processing of non-painful and painful cutaneous CO 2 laser stimulation and intramuscular electrical stimulation in 11 normal subjects. The overall wave form morphology of the long-latency evoked potentials (EPs) at the central vertex (Cz) was identical and surface topographic mappings of the 21-channel recordings showed similar distributions, suggesting involvement of common neural generators. However, the EPs caused by intramuscular stimulation differed from cutaneous stimulation in several distinct ways. First, the latency of the major positive and negative components were significantly shorter with intramuscular stimulation (N 128–145 ms; P 274–298 ms) compared to cutaneous stimulation (N 235–286 ms; P 371–383 ms) ( P<0.001). Second, the peak-to-peak amplitude and root-mean-square values of intramuscular EPs recorded at Cz showed a ceiling effect in the painful range, whereas the laser EPs continued to increase in this range. Third, painful intramuscular, but not non-painful, stimulation caused a frontal activity which not was observed with cutaneous laser stimulation at any intensity. Conduction velocity measurements indicated activation of nociceptive A-delta afferents with cutaneous laser stimulation (10.2±0.2 m/s) and activation of a mixed nerve fiber population with intramuscular electrical stimulation (65.8±25.8 m/s). Differences between laser and intramuscular EPs may be due to different types and origins of activated afferent fibers. Laser EPs can be used specifically to assess cutaneous A-delta fiber function, whereas intramuscular EPs reflect the cerebral processing of a mixed afferent input from muscle tissue.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.