Abstract
THE RESOURCEFUL ODYSSEUS eluded lotus eaters; he outwitted Cyclops; he withstood Sirens' call; he survived a journey to Hades; he navigated past Scylla and Charybdis; he escaped clutches of Calypso and came at last to his home, where he embraced his wife Penelope and told his story. (1) Homer covers much of their conversation with a veil of privacy, but departing from Homer's account, one could imagine that, in their embrace, Penelope turned to her husband and said, Odysseus, you have indeed overcome many fearful obstacles, but I wonder: why did you go to such great efforts? Why did you persevere through it all? The text suggests that, in his trials, Odysseus's primary and sustaining thought was not his own comfort, nor his fulfillment as a Greek hero, nor even his marriage. Adopting Odysseus's perspective, one can see that his mind must have had a single focus, so that, had his wife asked why he willingly suffered so much to come home, his only answer would have been, For you, Penelope, I did it for you. Such a scene illustrates Dietrich von Hildebrand's significant insight regarding man's ultimate end, as contained in his book, The Nature of Love. (2) Dietrich von Hildebrand's conception of human finality distinguishes itself and is especially valuable insofar as it focuses on how human love, in its highest expression, is self-transcendent. In von Hildebrand's language, human love is a in which a person is focused, not primarily on his own fulfillment, but on beauty of another that has importance in itself. Hence, one of von Hildebrand's great insights about human finality can be formulated in this way: just as Odysseus during his travails was focused above all on Penelope, so Christian, in an even greater way during pilgrimage of this life, is focused on God in Himself as the finis primarius ultimus (the primary ultimate end) of man (115). I begin this article by detailing von Hildebrand's position in itself. After this, in order to explore its profoundest implications, I will compare it with Germain Grisez's understanding of human finality. Throughout this work I will keep in mind example of Odysseus's love for Penelope, an example whose depth is best explored in light of exemplary and divine love of saints. Although von Hildebrand wrote his reflections on love primarily from a philosophical perspective, he points to theological applications that manifest world-transcending nature of human love in its fullness. One can approach von Hildebrand's insight by coming to terms with his language: what does he mean when he says that love is a response? He gives us a clue in beginning of his work. While alluding to a more developed discussion in his Ethics, von Hildebrand distinguishes between fundamentally different human responses to a present good. One is value-response; another is response seeking merely satisfying (19). (3) It is easy to grasp what it means to see a good as subjectively satisfying or pleasurable to me: this is a typical stance one has when encountering a delicious food that one would like to taste. It is a good I would like to enjoy; and enjoyment would be mine. A value-response, in contrast, is focused not on me, but on intrinsic worth of something (or someone) else. In a value-response, the object and its importance is itself theme; I ought to give it an adequate response for its own sake (36). An object in this case is important to me, not primarily because it satisfies my desire, nor helps me develop my nature, but because of the value that object as such possesses (ibid.). I can have a value-response to an impersonal object, as explorer John Muir did during a thunder storm in theYosemite valley. Writing about his experience, he exclaims, How interesting to trace history of a single raindrop! After two pages of enthusiastic description, he concludes: Every drop in all blessed throng [is] a silvery newborn star with lake and river, garden and grove, valley and mountain, all that landscape holds reflected in its crystal depths, God's messenger, angel of love sent on its way with majesty and pomp and display of power that make man's greatest shows ridiculous. …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.