Abstract

An inventory and assessment was made of 15 non-market valuation studies in Central American and Caribbean countries. Most utilized the contingent valuation method to determine willingness to pay for drinking water or protected areas. The method used suffered from a reliance on open-ended bidding, information framing and contingent scenarios lacking detail, limited population samples, and possible cultural-strategic biases associated with surveying local residents. Problems observed with respect to the single travel cost method study reviewed were a reliance on poor quality census data rather than visitor survey data, and unrealistic assumptions regarding transportation cost estimates, single-destination visitors, and consumer surplus levels of international visitors.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call