Non-isothermal creep aging behaviors of an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy

Abstract

To shorten production period and reduce manufacturing cost of high strength aluminum alloy integral panel components, a novel non-isothermal creep age forming (CAF) technology was developed. Taking an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy as the case material, the non-isothermal creep aging (NICA) behavior and the conventional isothermal creep aging (ICA) behavior were comparatively investigated. The corresponding creep deformations, material performance variations and precipitate microstructure evolutions were studied by creep aging tests, mechanical property and corrosion resistance tests, and transmission electron microscope (TEM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) characterizations. Unlike the ICA which contains short heating and cooling stages and long holding stage, the NICA only has heating and cooling stages, viz., the alloy is heated slowly and the cooling stage begins immediately when reaching the peak temperature. In the NICA process, the precipitates nucleate and grow up in the first half of heating stage, resulting in the reduction of creep rate and enhancement of mechanical strength. The coarsening of precipitates occurs in the second half of heating stage, elevating the creep rate and significantly improving the corrosion resistance. Nearby the peak temperature, the primary precipitates partially dissolve, and the creep rate, mechanical strength and corrosion resistance decrease. Distinctive from the ICA process, a secondary precipitation phenomenon takes place in the cooling stage of NICA, leading to the recovery of high mechanical strength. The higher heating-cooling rate (1 °C/min) is not beneficial to accumulating creep deformation in the shorter creep aging period, while the lower one (0.25 °C/min) causes the loss of mechanical strength due to the excessive dissolution of precipitates. The moderate heating-cooling rate (0.5 °C/min) can lead to larger creep deformation, better mechanical properties and more satisfactory corrosion resistances in the NICA treated alloy, reaching 87.0% of creep strain, 105.7% of yield strength and 97.9% of electric conductivity in the ICA treated alloy. It is worth noting that the time consumption of the optimal NICA process is only 52.9% of the ICA process.