Non-invasive pressure-volume analysis by 3-dimensional echocardiography: a novel method for left ventricular stroke work estimation

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital. Introduction Left ventricular pressure-volume analysis is a powerful method to quantify left ventricular function. A major limitation of its clinical utility, however, is the need for invasive pressure and volume measurements. We hypothesized that accurate non-invasive left ventricular (LV) stroke work analysis is feasible by combining continuous 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic LV volume measurements with non-invasive LV pressure curve estimation. Purpose To investigate if LV stroke work can be estimated non-invasively by combining 3D echocardiographic volume measurements with non-invasive pressure curve estimation. Methods In 21 open-chest anesthetized canines, piezoelectric crystals were placed in the LV subendocardium for volume measurements and a micromanometer catheter was placed in the LV cavity for pressure measurements. Echocardiography was performed directly on the heart to acquire 3D LV volumes and timings of mitral and aortic valve events. The estimated LV pressure curve was obtained by adjusting the cardiac phases of an LV reference pressure curve to these valve events and adjusting its amplitude to measured peak LV pressure. Stroke work was calculated as the area under the pressure-volume curve from mitral valve closure to mitral valve opening. Non-invasively estimated and invasively measured stroke work were compared. Recordings were done during baseline, aortic constriction, dobutamine infusion and after induction of left bundle branch block by ablation. Results Panel A in the Figure illustrates non-invasive (left) and invasive (right) pressure-volume loops from a representative experiment. Baseline and the different interventions are colour-coded allowing visual comparison of the similar non-invasive and invasive stroke work. Panel B shows the pooled data from all experiments. There was a strong correlation (r=0.98, p<0.0001) and good agreement between the non-invasive and invasive stroke work. Furthermore, the non-invasive method captured similar changes in stroke work during interventions as compared to the invasive method (Panel C). Conclusions Non-invasive pressure-volume analysis by combining 3D echocardiography and estimated pressure for stroke work evaluation, is feasible and accurate.