Non-invasive prediction of angiographic progression of coronary artery disease by dipyridamole-stress echocardiography.

Abstract

Coronary angiography is the currently accepted standard means for assessing progression of coronary artery disease. A dipyridamole-echocardiography test (DET) might provide an alternative non-invasive functional imaging method for this purpose. To assess whether variations in results of serial DET match variations in angiographic assessments of coronary artery disease. From the Pisa Institute of Clinical Physiology stress-echocardiography data bank (1983-1998), we selected 60 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria of coronary angiography and DET having each been performed and interpreted twice independently and within 1 week. The second angiographic and stress-echocardiographic assessment was performed 45+/-31 months after the initial one. Angiographic progressors were defined a priori as patients with any progression of stenosis to occlusion and those with any stenosis > 30% with > 20% progression of stenosis measured by visual and quantitative coronary angiography. Stress-echocardiography progressors were defined as those patients who had previously had a negative test of a test having a positive result and those patients who had positive results of tests both in initial testing and in a second session of testing with the latter having a peak wall-motion-score index > 0.12 (on a scale of 1, normal to 4, dyskinetic in a 16-segment model) larger than the former. Of the 60 patients, 44 were angiographic 'progressors' and 16 were 'non progressors'. Stress-echocardiographic responses were concordant with angiographic identification for 39 of 44 progressors and 15 of 16 non-progressors, with an overall concordance of 90%. Measurement of dipyridamole-stress-echocardiographic response allows one to separate angiographic progressors and non-progressors efficiently, simply by taking into account the presence, extent and severity of stress-induced abnormalities of wall motion.