Abstract

Non-invasive ventilation is an important intervention in treating acute respiratory failure caused by acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although there are studies that give evidence on the efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation over standard medical care for COPD and cardiogenic pulmonary edema, less are known about the form of non-invasive ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) as an effective intervention for respiratory failure and its efficacy and safety in prehospital settings. We conducted a systematic review by using PubMed and Google Scholar as databases for collecting studies related to the effectiveness of CPAP and BiPAP for cardiogenic pulmonary edema and COPD; the major outcome studied was reducing rates of endotracheal intubation secondary and tertiary outcomes included mortality reduction and shortening length of hospital stay. The study follows the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist 2009. Sixteen studies were identified, including systematic reviews, randomized control trials, and observational studies. Studies published on or after 2010 in a population greater than 40 years old suffering from acute COPD and cardiogenic pulmonary edema were taken for review. Studies that described other respiratory diseases treated with non-invasive ventilation were excluded. Quality appraisal was done using the Cochrane risk bias tool for randomized control trials, Amstar-2 for systematic reviews, and New Castle Ottawa Tool for observational studies. Five studies compared the effectiveness of CPAP and BiPAP with standard medical care in prehospital and emergency settings. Six studies described prehospital intervention. Both forms of non-invasive ventilation were equally significant and effective. Prehospital use had tremendously reduced intubation rates, with not much variability noticed for mortality and hospital stay. Non-invasive ventilation is an effective measure for respiratory failure secondary to COPD and ACPE. Early out of hospital utilization of CPAP and BiPAP reduces the rate of invasive ventilation and reduces complications due to endotracheal intubation. Endotracheal intubation is associated with a considerable incidence of complications like failed intubation, hypotension, or circulatory arrest, even if the emergency physician is well trained, making these forms of non-invasive ventilation safe and effective interventions in the prehospital settings.

Highlights

  • BackgroundRespiratory failure due to acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) caused by left ventricular failure are common presentations encountered in prehospital and emergency care settings [1]

  • Articles that gave data other than the effect of non-invasive ventilation in COPD and pulmonary edema were removed without any discrepancies

  • Studies that dealt with non-invasive ventilation continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) for COPD, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and prehospital non-invasive ventilation were collected for data extraction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Respiratory failure due to acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) caused by left ventricular failure are common presentations encountered in prehospital and emergency care settings [1]. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema is another cause of hypoxemic respiratory failure commonly treated with medications like morphine, nitroglycerine, oxygen therapy, and if failed with endotracheal intubation [3]. A mode of ventilatory support in which positive pressure is delivered into the lungs without an invasive endotracheal airway is called non-invasive ventilation [4]. It is frequently used to support patients with acute respiratory failure. Assessing a patient for non-invasive ventilation includes identifying the conditions responsible for acute respiratory failure typically responsive to non-invasive ventilation. The contraindication to noninvasive ventilation includes need for emergent intubation. Absolute contraindications include cardiac or respiratory arrest, severe respiratory distress, unstable cardiac arrythmias and relative contraindications include hemodynamic instability, facial

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call