Abstract
Background: The comparative effects of non-invasive imaging on management and clinical outcomes in low-risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients remain unclear. Methods: We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to obtain estimates of relative effectiveness of non-invasive diagnostic
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
