Non-Invasive Assessment of Graft Fibrosis After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Is There Still a Role for Liver Biopsy?

Abstract

Non-invasive methods have evolved as a surrogate for liver biopsy such as indirect markers (aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index, fibro-α score), transient elastography (TE), and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the value of MRE, TE, and indirect markers in detecting and staging allograft fibrosis compared to liver biopsies in patients who have undergone living donor liver transplantation for complications related to hepatitis C virus.A total of 31 living donor liver transplantation recipients with hepatitis C virus recurrence underwent a liver biopsy, TE, and MRE within 3 months of a liver biopsy. Fibrosis was assessed according to the biopsy and staged according to Metavir criteria.There was a significant correlation between both MRE and fibro-α scores, as well as histologic classification by liver biopsy (P = .02, .002). The diagnostic accuracy of MRE and fibro-α scores in diagnosing significant fibrosis (F ≥ 3) was measured as the area under the curve (.708 and .833, respectively). Both methods showed good diagnostic performance. TE and aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index were insignificantly correlated with the degree of fibrosis in liver biopsy (P value of .134, .535). At a cutoff value of 5.5 kPa, MRE predicted graft fibrosis (Metavir stage ≥ 3) with 71.43% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 45.5% positive predictive value, and 90% negative predictive value; at a cutoff value > 1.47, fibro-α scores predicted significant graft fibrosis (Metavir stage ≥ 3) with 85.7% sensitivity and 70.83% specificity, with a positive predictive value of 46.2% and a negative predictive value of 94.4%. These data suggest that non-invasive methods could be considered a reliable tool in assessing significant graft fibrosis post-living donor liver transplantation.