Non-hyperaemic coronary flow velocity acceleration indices correlate with hyperaemic microvascular resistance in patients with INOCA

Abstract

Abstract Background Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is associated with an overall worse prognosis. While the diagnosis and endo-typing of CMD currently rely on hyperaemic physiological indices, the search for accurate non-hyperaemic techniques continues. Flow velocity acceleration pattern is mechanistically associated with changes in shear stress, endothelial function, arterial stiffness and pressure in pulsatile flow systems (1-3). Purpose We aim to interrogate whether resting flow velocity acceleration indices correlate with hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR) in patients with Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). Methods In 21 Patients with INOCA (all of whom had presented with typical angina pectoris, had no significant epicardial stenoses but positive myocardial perfusion scan test for ischemia) invasive physiological assessment was performed by means of intracoronary Doppler. Hyperaemia was induced with intracoronary adenosine administration. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and HMR were calculated per their definitions. Flow velocity acceleration indices were derived from the first derivative of the averaged resting flow velocity waveforms with respect to time. We have defined 6 wave peaks of interest in all patients (peak diastolic acceleration (initial prominent peak with ventricular relaxation, referred as A), early diastolic deceleration (B), early re-acceleration wave (C), peak presystolic deceleration (seen just before initial systolic acceleration peak, J), initial systolic acceleration peak (X) and pre-diastolic deceleration nadir (Z)) and calculated the ratios between them as well as adjusted them with respect to resting mean flow velocity (Figure 1). Results The mean age was 59 ± 8 years and the majority of the study group was female (%81). Cardiovascular risk factors were common amongst the study group.All patients had CFR < 2.5. Mean CFR and HMR were 2.05 ± 0.32 and 2.20 ± 0.60 mmHg.cm.sec-1 respectively. Raw C peak magnitude was significantly correlated with APVh (rho:-0.457 p:0.037) and HMR (rho:0.612 p:0.004). Adjusting the C magnitudes with APVb at patient level yielded better correlations (APVh rho:-0.496 p:0.022 ; HMR:0.642 p:0.002). The ratio between diastolic reacceleration peak (C) and presystolic peak deceleration (J), C/J , adjusted with the APVb ((C/J)/APVb) showed the most pronounced correlation with HMR (rho: 0.758 p < 0.001) (unadjusted C/J – HMR rho: 0.718 p<0.001)(Figure 2). Conclusion(s) Acceleration characteristics of resting coronary flow velocity correlate with hyperaemic microvascular resistance indicating structurally impaired coronary microcirculation, hence their utilisation may aid developing non-hyperaemic physiological markers for coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with INOCA.Derived Acceleration WaveformsCorrelations between HMR and C/J Ratio