Abstract

The underlying mechanism for the establishment and maintenance of differential DNA methylation in imprinted genes is largely unknown. Previous studies using Dnmt1 knock-out embryonic stem (ES) cells demonstrated that, although re-expression of DNMT1 restored DNA methylation in the non-imprinted regions, the methylation patterns of imprinted genes could be restored only through germ line passage. Knock-out of Uhrf1, an accessory factor essential for DNMT1-mediated DNA methylation, in mouse ES cells also led to impaired global DNA methylation and loss of genomic imprinting. Here, we demonstrate that, although re-expression of UHRF1 in Uhrf1(-/-) ES cells restored DNA methylation for the bulk genome but not for most of the imprinted genes, it did rescue DNA methylation for the imprinted H19, Nnat, and Dlk1 genes. Analysis of histone modifications at the differential methylated regions of the imprinted genes by ChIP assays revealed that for the imprinted genes whose DNA methylation could be restored upon re-expression of UHRF1, the active histone markers (especially H3K4me3) were maintained at considerably low levels, and low levels were maintained even in Uhrf1(-/-) ES cells. In contrast, for the imprinted genes whose DNA methylation could not be restored upon UHRF1 re-expression, the active histone markers (especially H3K4me3) were relatively high and became even higher in Uhrf1(-/-) ES cells. Our study thus supports a role for histone modifications in determining the establishment of imprinting-related DNA methylation and demonstrates that mouse ES cells can be a valuable model for mechanistic study of the establishment and maintenance of differential DNA methylation in imprinted genes.

Highlights

  • Once erased, DNA methylation in imprinted genes was shown previously to be re-established only through germ line passage

  • Among a total of 102 imprinted genes that were spotted in the array, we found that 25 genes were either up- or down-regulated in the Uhrf1Ϫ/Ϫ embryonic stem (ES) cells with a cutoff of Ͼ1.5-fold change, whereas 77 genes remained unaffected

  • The concept derived from this study is that the establishment of imprinted DNA methylation is dependent on the unique environments of male and female germ cells, and once erased, the imprinted DNA methylation cannot be restored in non-germ line cells

Read more

Summary

Background

DNA methylation in imprinted genes was shown previously to be re-established only through germ line passage. What makes DMR methylation in imprinted genes so unique is that, re-expression of DNMT1 in Dnmt1-null ES cells rescues bulk DNA methylation in non-imprinted regions, the methylation patterns of imprinted genes can be restored only through germ line passage [18]. This finding highlights a major obstacle for investigating the underlying mechanism of genomic imprinting because the establishment of genomic imprinting occurs only through gametogenesis, and currently there is no suitable cellular model for study. Our study shows that mouse ES cells can be a useful model for dissecting the underlying mechanisms for establishment of differential DNA methylation in imprinted genes

Experimental Procedures
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call