Abstract
Non-Fungible Tokens (NTFs) artworks attract relevant trading volume in the secondary market. Their prices, primarily denominated in Ethereum cryptocurrency, recently experienced a substantial increase. In this paper, we first investigate whether the market for crypto art is informationally efficient and, secondly, if crypto art can be considered as an alternative to real-world art rather than a haven for crypto-money speculative traders. We find evidence of market inefficiency with long-lasting autoregressive patterns in price discovery. As for the nature of crypto art as an asset class, our findings support the idea that crypto art is unrelated to real-world art. Crypto art prices are mostly determined by gains in the cryptocurrency of denomination, whereas real-world art is mostly unrelated to the financial markets. We conclude that crypto art is far from being another medium to express artistic content and is currently just a storing unit for crypto-money, in absence of relevant alternatives.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
