Non-endoscopic Applications of Machine Learning in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Abstract

Gastric cancer is an important health burden characterized by high prevalence and mortality rate. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy coupled with biopsy is the primary means in which gastric cancer is diagnosed, and most of machine learning (ML) tools are developed in this area. This systematic review focuses on the applications of ML in gastric cancer that do not involve endoscopic image recognition. A systematic review of ML applications that do not involve endoscopy and are relevant to gastric cancer was performed in two databases and independently evaluated by the two authors. Information collected from the included studies are year of publication, ML algorithm, ML performance, specimen used to create the ML model, and clinical application of the model. From 791 screened studies, 63 studies were included in the systematic review. The included studies demonstrate that the non-endoscopic applications of ML can be divided into three main categories, which are diagnostics, predicting response to therapy, and prognosis prediction. Various specimen and algorithms were found to be used for these applications. Most of its clinical use includes histopathologic slide reading in the diagnosis of gastric cancer and a risk scoring system to determine the survival of patients or to determine the important variables that may affect the patient's prognosis. The systematic review suggests that there are numerous examples of non-endoscopic applications of ML that are relevant to gastric cancer. These studies have utilized various specimens, even non-conventional ones, thus showing great promise for the development of more non-invasive techniques. However, most of these studies are still in the early stages and will take more time before they can be clinically deployed. Moving forward, researchers in this field of study are encouraged to improve data curation and annotation, improve model interpretability, and compare model performance with the currently accepted standard in the clinical practice.