Abstract

ABSTRACT The objectives of this study are to review the literature on counterfeiting, to develop a morphological analysis (MA) framework and to identify the major research gaps that offer potential for future research. The MA framework is based on 120 research papers published in 50 research journals over 25 years (1994 to 2019). This systematic literature review followed a 3-step process. Step 1 identified the relevant research papers, step 2 classified them based on their fundamental, methodological and chronological features and step 3 developed the MA framework and identified research gaps. Five dimensions, involving 41 focused themes, emerged from the analysis. It uncovers 338 distinct research gaps. Of these, those topics offering the most potential for future research are presented here. The findings intend to help marketers and researchers look at non-deceptive counterfeiting holistically.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.