Abstract

AbstractWithout units, there are no boundaries; and without boundaries, there are no units. Traditional linguistics takes units such as sentences and intonation phrases for granted, treating them as static. Interactional linguistics has reconfigured many of these units, treating them as emergent, focusing on their evolution in time, and how they implement social actions. A productive line of research of interactional linguistics has been this tension between conventional linguistic units and units of (and for) interaction (Reed and Beatrice 2013; Ogden and Walker 2013). The cesura approach (Barth-Weingarten 2016) focuses on the constitution of phonetic-prosodic discontinuities, which give rise to boundaries, “cesuras”, which it treats as a continuum from “no cesura” through “candidate cesuras” of various strengths, to “full cesuras”. However, there are also elements of spoken interaction whose unit-hood is not obvious at all levels of description; and it is a subset of these that form the focus of this article. We illustrate this with extracts of multimodal talk where two interactants taste and assess unfamiliar food and produce the token “mm”. We show how the alignment (and non-alignment) of boundaries of sequential, prosodic, gestural, lexical, and syntactic units can be a semiotic resource. Data are obtained from Chilean Spanish.

Highlights

  • Units and boundaries are complementary concepts: without units, there are no boundaries; and without boundaries, there are no units

  • One of the productive lines of research of interactional linguistics has been this tension between conventional linguistic units and units of interaction, including cesuras (Barth-Weingarten 2016; Ogden and Walker 2013; Szczepek Reed and Beatrice 2013)

  • In common with Mondada (2016) and Rossano (2012), that pointing and gaze behaviours often display an orientation to linguistic units and to the kinds of action that linguistic units project or perform

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Units and boundaries are complementary concepts: without units, there are no boundaries; and without boundaries, there are no units. Traditional linguistics takes for granted that there are units such as sentences and intonation phrases and treats them as a finished product. Interactional linguistics has reconfigured many of these units and tends to treat them as emergent, focusing on the process of their evolution in time, and how they implement social actions. One of the productive lines of research of interactional linguistics has been this tension between conventional linguistic units and units of (and for) interaction, including cesuras (Barth-Weingarten 2016; Ogden and Walker 2013; Szczepek Reed and Beatrice 2013). “mm” is used to convey several actions (including acknowledgements, lapse terminators, gustatory tokens, or marking incipient speakership, among others); it may occur as a stand-alone item or at the start of a longer turn, and it exhibits a wide

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call