Abstract
The activities of all 1513 individuals who visited a public hunting and fishing area near Spearfish, South Dakota, USA, were recorded from May 16 to August 16, 2006. Over the entire period, slightly less than 60% of the visitors were engaged in fishing, and they accounted for nearly 80% of the total visitation time. Over 40% of the visitors were primarily there for non-consumptive (not hunting or fishing) reasons, including touring (sight-seeing), dog training and exercising, and swimming. Less than 1% of the visitors were there for photography. The percentage of visitors fishing decreased from a high of over 65% in the first 31-day period to less than 50% in the third 31-day period, with nearly all of the non-consumptive activities showing a reverse trend. The percentage of visitors swimming or conducting dog activities doubled from the first to third periods. The percentage of time that visitors spent fishing decreased over time, while the time spent on non-consumptive activities increased. However, the increase in non-consumptive activity time was not necessarily in proportion to the increase in the number of visitors involved with non-consumptive activities. By the final period, more visitors were at the area for touring, dogs, and swimming, than for fishing, but fishing still accounted for most of the visitation time. These results indicate an abundance of non-consumptive activities on a public area purchased and maintained with revenue from consumptive hunting and fishing activities, creating the opportunity for user conflicts and potentially threatening the user-pay model of natural resource conservation.
Highlights
730 Game Production Areas (GPAs) encompassing 119,382 ha are located within the state ofHow to cite this paper: Simpson, G., Barnes, M.E., Parker, T.M. and Voorhees, J. (2014) Non-Consumptive Activities on a Public Hunting and Fishing Area
The excise taxes were authorized by the United States Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act of 1937, which is more commonly referred to as the Pittman-Robertson (PR) Act, and the Sport-Fish Restoration Act of 1950, which is more commonly referred to as the Dingell-Johnson (DJ) Act
Belyea and Lerg [4] found that 72% of the use of public game and wildlife areas in Michigan involved non-hunting activities, and 70% to 90% of the people using lands purchased with PR funding are not engaged in hunting activities
Summary
730 Game Production Areas (GPAs) encompassing 119,382 ha are located within the state ofHow to cite this paper: Simpson, G., Barnes, M.E., Parker, T.M. and Voorhees, J. (2014) Non-Consumptive Activities on a Public Hunting and Fishing Area. South Dakota, USA [1] These areas were purchased, and are maintained, by the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks with funds from hunting and fishing licenses and federal excise taxes on guns, ammunition, and fishing equipment. The excise taxes were authorized by the United States Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act of 1937, which is more commonly referred to as the Pittman-Robertson (PR) Act, and the Sport-Fish Restoration Act of 1950, which is more commonly referred to as the Dingell-Johnson (DJ) Act. Since its inception, more than 62% of PR funds have been used to purchase, develop, or maintain wildlife management areas in the USA [2], with over 1.6 million ha of public hunting land purchased with PR funding during the first 50 years of the program [3]. Nelson et al [5] observed that non-consumptive use may be seasonal in nature, and noted that during fall hunting seasons, over 90% of public hunting land use involved hunting, trapping, fishing, and wildlife viewing
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
