Abstract

Root canal treatment (RCT) has high success rate, still many patients are apprehensive of this procedure. Objective: To determine the frequency of patients’ avoiding RCT in endodontically treatable teeth and identify the reasons given by the patients to avoid RCT. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the department of operative dentistry at Margalla Institute of Health Sciences, Rawalpindi including patients who refused RCT in endodontically treatable teeth (n= 250). Patient’s demographics, tooth related variables and reason for not pursuing root canal treatment were recorded. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square test were run to report sample characteristics with level of significance at ≤ 0.05. Results: Two hundred and fifty (250, 21.09%) out of 1185 patients advised for RCT refused the procedure. Majority of the participants were female (169, 67.6%). The mean age of the patients was 32.66 years (SD ± 12.313). The most common reason as reported by almost half of the patients (106, 43%) for avoiding RCT was “financial constraints” followed by a desire to take a “second opinion or advice” (46,18%). The majority of the male participants as compared to female participants refused RCT due to financial constraints with statistically significant association (p˂0.001). A reasonable number of female patients also identified “want second opinion/advice” as a reason for avoiding RCT(p˂0.001). Conclusions: The frequency of patients avoiding RCT in endodontically treatable teeth was 21.09%. Financial constraints followed by seeking a second opinion or advice were the most common reasons identified by the patients avoiding RCT in endodontically treatable teeth.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.