Abstract
Recent advances in the analysis of strain-induced boundaries in cold working have led to a strong evolution in understanding of their nature and in nomenclature. This has impacted on the hot working domain, instigating a re-examination of microstructural behavior and pressure to revise the terminology. While hot working involves high strain rates and strains, it shares with creep the development of a steady state regime at relatively low strains. The development of substructure and response to Taylor polycrystalline constraints have essential differences from those in cold working, so the different boundary character warrants retention of their traditional names.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
