Nocturnal Heart Rate Response to Spontaneous Arousals Following Sleep Restriction

Abstract

Short sleep duration is associated with future cardiovascular disease including hypertension, especially in females, but mechanistic evidence is largely lacking. Experimental sleep restriction has been shown to cause short sleep-mediated tachycardia and reduced heart rate variability, indicative of autonomic cardiac instability, in some but not all studies. Heart rate (HR) response to spontaneous cortical arousals can be regarded as an index of autonomic cardiac control given its characteristic temporal pattern. Whether the HR response to cortical arousals is altered during experimental sleep restriction remains unknown. We hypothesized that sleep restriction would result in augmented HR reactivity to spontaneous arousals, and that this response would be more marked in females. We studied 19 young, healthy subjects (eight females, age: 23.5 ± 5 years, body mass index [BMI]: 24.5 ± 3.6 kg/m2). In a randomized, crossover design, participants were tested during a normal sleep (NS, 9 hr sleep opportunity) or sleep restriction (SR, 4 hr sleep opportunity) study arm. Each 16-day study visit consisted of a 4-day study acclimation phase, 9-day experimental sleep perturbation segment, followed by a 3-day recovery period. An overnight polysomnography (PSG) study was conducted on study days 2, 5 and 11 (at baseline and after 1 and 7 days of restricted versus control sleep). A registered PSG technician provided sleep staging and spontaneous arousal scoring, which was confirmed by an investigator with sleep expertise (IMG). For each identified spontaneous arousal, the HR change was quantified for 30 cardiac cycles post-arousal onset and compared to a pre-arousal baseline (average HR 5 – 10 cardiac cycles prior to arousal). An arousal was considered valid for analysis if at least one minute of stage N2 or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep occurred following sleep stage transition and was at least 30 seconds apart from other sleep disturbance-related events (e.g., limb movement, apneic event, etc.). Given low prevalence of slow wave sleep (SWS) arousals, arousals occurring in that sleep stage were excluded from present analysis. Statistical analysis, including repeated measures ANOVA (RMANOVA, p < 0.05) with condition and time (cardiac cycles) as within-subjects factors and sex as the between-subjects factor, was conducted to compare the beat-to-beat HR response to arousal between study conditions. Additionally, average and peak HR responses to spontaneous arousals were compared via RMANOVA with condition and time (study days) as within-subjects and sex as between-subjects factors. HR response to spontaneous arousal in stage two and REM sleep was similar between NS and SR on study day 5 or day 11 (condition × time: p = 0.943, 0.865). Secondary analysis of average and peak HR responsiveness to spontaneous arousals in stage two and REM sleep between conditions and study days was also not statistically different (condition × time: p = 0.193, 0.185). Last, no significant sex differences were detected across comparisons (condition × time × sex: p > 0.05 for all). These findings suggest that a 9-day sleep restriction paradigm may not alter cardiac autonomic function in otherwise healthy adults. Future work is warranted to determine whether these results extend to individuals with established cardiovascular risk factors or cardiovascular disease. Support: NIH T32-DK007013, R01-114676, and CTSA grant UL1-TR002377. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.