Abstract

Climate warming advances the optimal timing of breeding for many animals. For migrants to start breeding earlier, a concurrent advancement of migration is required, including premigratory fueling of energy reserves. We investigate whether barnacle geese are time constrained during premigratory fueling and whether there is potential to advance or shorten the fueling period to allow an earlier migratory departure. We equipped barnacle geese with GPS trackers and accelerometers to remotely record birds’ behavior, from which we calculated time budgets. We examined how time spent foraging was affected by the available time (during daylight and moonlit nights) and thermoregulation costs. We used an energetic model to assess onset and rates of fueling and whether geese can further advance fueling by extending foraging time. We show that, during winter, when facing higher thermoregulation costs, geese consistently foraged at night, especially during moonlit nights, in order to balance their energy budgets. In spring, birds made use of the increasing day length and gained body stores by foraging longer during the day, but birds stopped foraging extensively during the night. Our model indicates that, by continuing nighttime foraging throughout spring, geese may have some leeway to advance and increase fueling rate, potentially reaching departure body mass 4 days earlier. In light of rapid climatic changes on the breeding grounds, whether this advancement can be realized and whether it will be sufficient to prevent phenological mismatches remains to be determined.

Highlights

  • Animals in seasonal environments can optimize reproductive success by matching reproduction timing with seasonal peaks in food availability (van Noordwijk et al 1995)

  • We calculated total energetic costs from time budgets, which we integrated with modeled energetic intake such that body mass trajectories could be calculated for 16 individual geese for which continuous measurements were available for the entire study period

  • We find that barnacle geese balance their energy budget in winter by expanding foraging to moonlit nights in cold conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals in seasonal environments can optimize reproductive success by matching reproduction timing with seasonal peaks in food availability (van Noordwijk et al 1995). Adults themselves need to deposit energy before they can lay and incubate their eggs and may benefit from breeding later as they cannot achieve rapid body mass gain before the peak in food availability (Prop and de Vries 1993). Some migratory animals escape this problem by making use of multiple food peaks along their flyway as they migrate along a gradient of delayed onset of spring (a “green wave”; Drent et al 1978; Shariatinajafabadi et al 2014; Wang et al 2019) This allows adults to prepare for reproduction during migration using subsequent peaks in food quality in the wintering and staging grounds, while their offspring benefits from a peak in food availability on the breeding grounds (van der Graaf et al 2006). For long-distance migrants, an advancement of departure is only possible when animals are in a condition to migrate and, may require an advancement of energy deposition for migration and reproduction (Lameris et al 2017; Rakhimberdiev et al 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call