Abstract

This article examines how residents experience and account for stigma at Claremont Court, a modernist social housing scheme built in Edinburgh in the early 1960s. Although listed as having special architectural interest, the building has been subject to disinvestment and has a mix of residents, including council and private renters as well as owner-occupiers. This article explores micro-distinctions between residents, showing how the categories ‘stigmatiser’ and ‘stigmatised’ are not as rigid as we might expect. It then considers stigma associated not with residents but, rather, the building itself, and argues that closer attention to the relationship between the material and social is required in order to understand residents’ complex articulations of belonging. Finally, residents’ views on dirt and rubbish are explored, showing how they use these signifiers of stigma to reveal concerns about shame and respectability. Responding to the call from this journal for more sociological understandings of stigma, this article argues that interactionist approaches offer an important alternative, one that highlights how stigma is negotiated, resisted and apportioned in everyday life. This perspective reveals residents’ practices in interaction with the material environment, as well as the ways in which stigmatisation processes work simultaneously in upward and downward directions, rather than in a unidirectional way.

Highlights

  • A growing body of work within the social sciences draws attention to processes by which those who live in social housing are subject to stigmatisation (Baxter, 2017; Palmer et al, 2004; Roberts, 2017; Thoburn, 2018)

  • Tyler has suggested that an understanding of stigma as ‘embedded within the social relations of capitalism, and as a form of power entangled with histories of capitalism, colonialism and patriarchy’ is needed, since much writing focuses only on ‘individual experiences . . . in ways that occlude an understanding of stigma as a material force, a structural and structuring form of power’ (2020, pp. 8–9)

  • We have suggested that micro-distinctions between residents at Claremont Court are produced to make ‘them/us’ categorisations, which both resist and apportion stigma at the same time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A growing body of work within the social sciences draws attention to processes by which those who live in social housing are subject to stigmatisation (Baxter, 2017; Palmer et al, 2004; Roberts, 2017; Thoburn, 2018). These studies highlight the destructive effects of practices which denigrate estates and their residents and reveal how, within neoliberal policies of ‘austerity’, disinvestment in the welfare state has been obscured by moralising discourses about poorer people. Tyler has suggested that an understanding of stigma as ‘embedded within the social relations of capitalism, and as a form of power entangled with histories of capitalism, colonialism and patriarchy’ is needed, since much writing focuses only on ‘individual experiences . . . in ways that occlude an understanding of stigma as a material force, a structural and structuring form of power’ (2020, pp. 8–9)

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call