No-touch ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma has the potential to prevent intrasubsegmental recurrence to the same degree as surgical resection.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to clarify the utility of a no-touch pincer ablation procedure that uses bipolar electrodes to prevent intrasubsegmental tumor recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to surgical resection. We evaluated 175 consecutive patients with HCC (single nodule, tumor diameter ≤ 30mm) who underwent surgical resection (146 received partial resection) and 313 patients who received RFA; 277 patients received touch ablation using a monopolar or bipolar RFA device, and 36 received no-touch ablation using a bipolar RFA device. Pretreatment arterial and portal phase dynamic computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were classified into four enhancement patterns: Type 1 and Type 2 are homogeneous enhancement patterns without or with increased arterial blood flow, respectively; Type 3 is a heterogeneous enhancement pattern with a septum-like structure; and Type 4 is an irregularly shaped ring structure enhancement pattern. Cumulative recurrence rates significantly differed between procedures (surgical resection, 7.5%; no-touch ablation, 2.9%; and touch ablation, 17.7% at the third year; P = 0.005). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that enhancement pattern type (Type 3: hazard ratio [HR], 2.95; P = 0.002; and Type 4: HR, 3.88, P = 0.002), treatment procedure (touch ablation: HR, 3.36; P < 0.001), and serum α-fetoprotein level (≥30μg/L: HR, 1.87; P = 0.009) were significant predictors of intrasubsegmental recurrence. No significant differences between no-touch ablation and surgical resection were observed. The no-touch pincer ablation procedure has the potential to prevent intrasubsegmental recurrence after RFA for patients with HCC to the same degree as partial resection.