Abstract

The specialization of individuals in specific behavioural tasks is often attributed either to irreversible differences in development, which generate functionally divergent cooperative phenotypes, or to age-related changes in the relative frequency with which individuals perform different cooperative activities; both of which are common in many insect caste systems. However, contrasts in cooperative behaviour can take other forms and, to date, few studies of cooperative behaviour in vertebrates have explored the effects of age, adult phenotype and early development on individual differences in cooperative behaviour in sufficient detail to discriminate between these alternatives. Here, we used multinomial models to quantify the extent of behavioural specialization within nonreproductive Damaraland mole-rats, Fukomys damarensis, at different ages. We showed that, although there were large differences between individuals in their contribution to cooperative activities, there was no evidence of individual specialization in cooperative activities that resembled the differences found in insect societies with distinct castes where individual contributions to different activities are negatively related to each other. Instead, individual differences in helping behaviour appeared to be the result of age-related changes in the extent to which individuals committed to all forms of helping. A similar pattern is observed in cooperatively breeding meerkats, Suricata suricatta, and there is no unequivocal evidence of caste differentiation in any cooperative vertebrate. The multinomial models we employed offer a powerful heuristic tool to explore task specialization and developmental divergence across social taxa and provide an analytical approach that may be useful in exploring the distribution of different forms of helping behaviour in other cooperative species.

Highlights

  • The specialization of individuals in specific behavioural tasks is often attributed either to irreversible differences in development, which generate functionally divergent cooperative phenotypes, or to agerelated changes in the relative frequency with which individuals perform different cooperative activities; both of which are common in many insect caste systems

  • Contrasts in cooperative behaviour can take other forms and, to date, few studies of cooperative behaviour in vertebrates have explored the effects of age, adult phenotype and early development on individual differences in cooperative behaviour in sufficient detail to discriminate between these alternatives

  • Our analysis found no evidence for task specialization in nonreproductive Damaraland mole-rats

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The specialization of individuals in specific behavioural tasks is often attributed either to irreversible differences in development, which generate functionally divergent cooperative phenotypes, or to agerelated changes in the relative frequency with which individuals perform different cooperative activities; both of which are common in many insect caste systems. The case for behavioural specialization in cooperatively breeding mammals has been most strongly advanced for several of the social African mole-rats, including the naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber, and the Damaraland mole-rat, Fukomys damarensis In these two species it has been suggested that individuals can be separated into discrete functional groups that differ in their relative contributions to different cooperative activities (Bennett & Faulkes, 2000; Bennett & Jarvis, 1988; Jarvis, 1981; Scantlebury, Speakman, Oosthuizen, Roper, & Bennett, 2006) and their probability of dispersing (O'Riain, Jarvis, & Faulkes, 1996), as well as in related aspects of their size and shape (Bennett & Faulkes, 2000). It is possible to examine the extent to which cooperative behaviours are correlated within individuals, the temporal stability of any correlations across development, and other phenotypic determinants of behaviour, which together underpin the distribution of behaviour across individuals in cooperative societies

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call