Abstract

This article analyses the formal and lived organisation of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD, Alternative for Germany). We show that the party is exceptional among what is usually understood as the populist radical right (PRR) party family, at least from an organisational perspective: The AfD sharply contradicts the “standard model” of PRR party organisation, which emphasises “charismatic” leadership and the centralisation of power as key features. Instead, studying the AfD’s efforts to adopt some elements of a mass-party organisation and its relatively decentralised decision-making underlines the importance of “movement-party” strategy, collective leadership, and internal democracy—concepts that are usually associated with Green and left-wing parties. Our analysis shows how the party’s organisation is essential for understanding its development more broadly as it reflects and reinforces sharp intra-party conflict. From this perspective, the case of the AfD sheds new light on the relationship between PRR party organisation and electoral success, indicating the importance of strong ties to parts of society over effective internal management as long as demand for anti-immigration parties is high. We conclude that even though AfD quickly built up a relatively inclusive organisational structure, the role of both its leadership and its rank-and-file is still a matter of controversy.

Highlights

  • This article analyses the formal and lived organisation of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD, Alternative for Germany)

  • We show that the AfD is exceptional among what is usually understood as the populist radical right (PRR) party family, at least from an organisational perspective, Politics and Governance, 2021, Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 263–274 as it sharply contradicts the “standard model” of PRR party organisation, which emphasises “charismatic” lead‐ ership and the centralisation of power as key fea‐ tures (Betz, 1998; Heinisch & Mazzoleni, 2016)

  • Instead, studying the AfD’s efforts to adopt some elements of a mass‐party organisation and its relatively decen‐ tralised decision‐making underlines the importance of “movement‐party” strategy, collective leadership, and internal democracy—concepts that are usually associ‐ ated with Green and left‐wing parties

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article analyses the formal and lived organisation of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD, Alternative for Germany). The absence of strong leadership has provided plenty of opportunities for the public expression of internal dis‐ agreement. From this perspective, the case of the AfD sheds new light on the relationship between PRR party organisation and electoral success, indicating the impor‐ tance of strong ties to parts of society (Dinas et al, 2016) over effective internal management (Art, 2011; Bolleyer & Bytzek, 2017; Carter, 2005) as long as demand for anti‐ immigration parties is high. We stress the need for further research on the practices and perceptions of intra‐party democracy within PRR parties and their rela‐ tionship towards social movements

A Brief History of the AfD
A Considerable Degree of Formal and Informal Organisation
Recruitment and Mobilisation: A Movement‐Party Strategy
The Role of the Internet for Mobilisation
Reasons for the Adoption of Elements of a Mass Party‐Type Organisation
Decentralisation of Power
Internal Democracy
Participants
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call