Abstract

Males of the damselfly Hetaerina rosea may defend mating sites along river margins (resident males) or, alternatively, wander among different areas presumably searching for mates (nonterritorial males). Although the occurrence of territorial and nonterritorial males of H. rosea is very common in Brazil, studies examining which factors may be responsible for the adoption of alternative mate-locating tactics in this species are inexistent. We investigated the relationship between the adoption of these alternative mate-locating tactics by males of H. rosea and two possible causes: body weight and male abundance. We carried the study in three areas: sites 1, 2 and 3. Samples were monthly undertaken in sites 1 and 2 between September/2001 and August/2002 and in site 3 between May/1999 and January/2001. Using the scan method with fixed areas and mark-resighting techniques, we did not find any relationship between the proportion of nonterritorial males and male abundance per month on sites 2 (n=6) and 3 (n=7), indicating that the adoption of alternative mate-locating tactics is not affected by competition for territories. In the same way, nonterritorial and resident males showed similar body and thoracic weight measures (n=30 and n=27 for sites 2 and 3 respectively). Maybe the nonterritorial tactic is adopted by individuals searching for better territories or males that were evicted from their defended sites. The absence of relationship between weight and male territorial status is in accordance with other Hetaerina species. However, other traits not investigated here such as parasitic load, fat content and age may influence the adoption of different mate-acquisition tactics in H. rosea males.

Highlights

  • The occurrence of mating systems with territorial defence is widespread among insects (Thornhill and Alcock 1983)

  • If the nonterritorial tactics are adopted as less profitable alternatives by weaker males when there is intense competition for the available mating areas, the proportion of nonterritorial males should be a direct function of the number of individuals competing for the available sites (Alcock and O’Neill 1986, Cordero 1999)

  • If the territorial defence provides higher mating success, all individuals should adopt this tactic during periods of low male abundance when there must be a high availability of suitable sites to territorial defence per male

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The occurrence of mating systems with territorial defence is widespread among insects (Thornhill and Alcock 1983). The occurrence of different mate-locating strategies is clearly associated with morphological traits, such as the presence of horns in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Emlen 1997) and wing colours dimorphism in the damselfly Mnais pruinosa costalis (Watanabe 1990). Weight and size are two of the most frequently characteristics related to the adoption of different male mate-locating tactics (Alcock et al 1978, Kemp and Wiklund 2001, Córdoba-Aguilar and Cordero-Rivera 2005). Morphological or physiological differences among males with distinct matelocating tactics should be stronger when the competition is more intense In this sense, if the territorial defence provides higher mating success, all individuals should adopt this tactic during periods of low male abundance when there must be a high availability of suitable sites to territorial defence per male. The study of tropical species can potentially add balance to the general picture of selective forces that shape reproductive systems in this group of insects

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call