Abstract

AbstractPredatory fish structure communities through prey pursuit and consumption and, in many marine systems, the gadoids are particularly important. These predators have flexible feeding behaviours and often feed on large prey items. Digestion times of large prey are usually longer than handling times, and gut processing limits feeding rate at high prey density. Optimizing the gut content mix can therefore be an important behavioural strategy. Here, we develop a foraging model that incorporates gut processing and use the model to disentangle internal and external limitations on feeding in the omnivorous cod (Gadus morhua, Gadidae). We extend the traditional definition of prey profitability to consider prey digestive quality, which we quantify for prey of Northeast Atlantic cod populations. We find an important role for gut limitation; within a range of ecologically relevant temperatures and prey densities, predicted feeding rates were strongly reduced compared to feeding constrained by external factors only, and the optimal diet composition under gut limitation differed from predictions from traditional foraging theory. Capelin, a main prey of Northeast Arctic cod, had the highest digestive quality of all prey across ecosystems, but the cold temperatures in the Barents Sea strongly limited feeding rate by slowing down digestion. Baltic cod fed on a higher proportion of poor‐quality prey compared to the other populations, contributing to its slow growth in relation to water temperature. Gut limitation is particularly important to consider in foraging models for fish with many alternative prey species or fish occupying cold waters where digestion is slow.

Highlights

  • The feeding rate of most predators appears to be limited by prey encounter or digestion rather than prey handling (Giske & Salvanes, 1995; Jeschke, Kopp, & Tollrian, 2002), which was the main focus in early optimal foraging models (Charnov, 1976; Emlen, 1966; MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Pulliam, 1974; Schoener, 1971; Werner & Hall, 1974)

  • 3.3 Feeding constraints differ with environment and prey density

  • We present a mechanistic foraging model that explicitly incorporates gut limitation and disentangle internal and external limitations on feeding rate in fishes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The feeding rate of most predators appears to be limited by prey encounter or digestion rather than prey handling (Giske & Salvanes, 1995; Jeschke, Kopp, & Tollrian, 2002), which was the main focus in early optimal foraging models (Charnov, 1976; Emlen, 1966; MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Pulliam, 1974; Schoener, 1971; Werner& Hall, 1974). The feeding rate of most predators appears to be limited by prey encounter or digestion rather than prey handling (Giske & Salvanes, 1995; Jeschke, Kopp, & Tollrian, 2002), which was the main focus in early optimal foraging models If a predator frequently encounters, attacks and con‐ sumes prey at a rate that fills up its stomach, it will be forced to take a break from feeding (Van Gils et al, 2005). This sets an upper limit on predation risk for prey, and the predator can spend more time in safety, digesting. 2.8 Comparing prey profitability and diet composi‐ 7 tion across ecosystems

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call