No risk to scrambling? Mating tactic does not affect the frequency of leg autotomy in a New Zealand harvestman

Abstract

Intense sexual selection on males may drive the evolution of exaggerated weaponry, typically used in contests for females or reproductive sites. In some species, males have discontinuous variation in weapon morphology that is accompanied by alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs). Major males with enlarged weapons usually exhibit a mating tactic based on female or resource defence, which makes them relatively sedentary. Minor males with reduced or absent weapons may exhibit a scramble competition mating tactic, which involves increased movement in search of females. Thus, the main costs paid by majors involve the expression/maintenance of exaggerated structures and potential injuries during contests. In turn, the main costs paid by minors are likely related to increased exposure to predation during mate search, yet this cost has rarely been considered for minors. Harvestmen are an arachnid group with diverse male weaponry, including many cases of male polymorphism associated with ARTs. Species of the suborder Eupnoi use leg autotomy as a common antipredator defence. Here we investigated whether leg autotomy (a proxy for predation risk) is more frequent in minors of the weapon polymorphic harvestman Forsteropsalis pureora , which has three male morphs with drastically different cheliceral size and morphology. Leg autotomy was very common, with 54% of wild-caught individuals missing at least one leg (mostly leg II), but we found no evidence for differential predation risk between male morphs during adulthood. In a predator simulation experiment, we found no difference in the likelihood or latency to autotomize a leg between male morphs or leg types (legs I, II, III or IV). However, males already missing legs were more reluctant to autotomize an additional leg. Our results suggest that while leg autotomy is a common antipredator strategy, with no difference between male tactics, costs are compounded as additional legs are autotomized and males may strategically decide not to autotomize in future predator encounters. • New Zealand harvestmen autotomize (lose) legs to escape predators. • This defence strategy is common in wild populations. • Sensory legs are lost more often than locomotory legs. • Harvestmen that have lost legs in the past take longer to drop an additional leg. • Male reproductive strategy does not affect autotomy risk.