Abstract
PurposeThe subjective nature of pain assessment and its large variance negatively affect patient–health care provider communication and reduce the assay sensitivity of pain clinical trials. Given the lack of an objective gold standard measure, identifying the source (true or error) of the within-subject variability of pain reports is a challenge. By assessing the within-subjects variability of pain and taste reports, alongside with interoceptive measures, the current study is aimed to investigate if the ability to reliably report bodily sensations is a cross-modal characteristic.Patients and MethodsThis prospective study enrolled healthy volunteers from local universities. After consenting, subjects underwent the Focus Analgesia Selection Task (FAST), to assess within-subjects variability of pain reports in response to experimental noxious stimuli; a taste task, which similarly assesses within-subjects variability of tastes (salty and sweet) intensity reports; and the heartbeat perception task, an interoceptive task aimed to assess how accurate subjects are in monitoring and reporting their own heartbeat. In addition, all subjects completed the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Spearman’s correlations were used to assess relations between all measures.ResultsSixty healthy volunteers were recruited. Variability of intensity reports of different modalities were independent of each other (P > 0.05 for all correlations). The only correlation found was within modality, between variability of intensity reports of salt and sweet tastes (Spearman’s r = 0.477, P < 0.001). No correlations were found between any of the task results and questionnaire results.ConclusionWithin-subjects variability of pain reports do not relate to variability of reports of other modalities or to interoceptive awareness. Further research is ongoing to investigate the clinical relevance of within-subjects’ variability of pain reports.
Highlights
The assessment of pain intensity, such as intensities of other subjective experiences, is challenging
Within-subjects variability of pain reports can be assessed by the Focused Analgesia Selection Test (FAST) task (Treister et al, 2017), which is based on exposing subjects to repeated noxious stimuli of various intensities in a blinded manner
Participants enrolled into the study only if they met the following criteria: (1) age above 18; (2) absence of acute or chronic pain disorders; (3) no reports of psychiatric, cognitive, and/or neurological disorders; and (4) no chronic use of medications except for oral contraceptives
Summary
The assessment of pain intensity, such as intensities of other subjective experiences, is challenging Both clinical care and research findings depend on such subjective self-reports, reported on one-dimensional scales that are variably understood by subjects (Dionne et al, 2005). Such limitations are reflected in experts’ concerns regarding the appropriateness of pain intensity measures as primary outcomes in chronic pain populations (Ballantyne and Sullivan, 2015), and in lack of use of such scales by pain clinicians (Backonja and Farrar, 2015). Patients vary in the tendency to demonstrate within-subjects variability of pain reports. Within-subjects variability of pain reports can be assessed by the Focused Analgesia Selection Test (FAST) task (Treister et al, 2017), which is based on exposing subjects to repeated noxious stimuli of various intensities in a blinded manner
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
