Abstract
This paper aims to demonstrate the advantages of a sequential approach to decision making in climate policies. This sequential approach is necessary because of the uncertainties regarding both the avoided costs of climate change and the costs of GHG emission abatement. This assessment focuses on the minimization of learning time, the reduction of technical and institutional inertia, and the possible unexpected non-linearities in abatement curves. A stylized representation of so-called ‘no-regret’ short-term potentials, of long-term innovation trends and of backstop technologies is used. We show that if we do take care of the inertia constraints in the decision process, both policies (namely the no-regret and the innovation process exploitation) becomes crucial in terms of minimization of the learning time.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.