Abstract

Quantum information theorists have created axiomatic reconstructions of quantum mechanics (QM) that are very successful at identifying precisely what distinguishes quantum probability theory from classical and more general probability theories in terms of information-theoretic principles. Herein, we show how one such principle, Information Invariance and Continuity, at the foundation of those axiomatic reconstructions, maps to “no preferred reference frame” (NPRF, aka “the relativity principle”) as it pertains to the invariant measurement of Planck’s constant h for Stern-Gerlach (SG) spin measurements. This is in exact analogy to the relativity principle as it pertains to the invariant measurement of the speed of light c at the foundation of special relativity (SR). Essentially, quantum information theorists have extended Einstein’s use of NPRF from the boost invariance of measurements of c to include the SO(3) invariance of measurements of h between different reference frames of mutually complementary spin measurements via the principle of Information Invariance and Continuity. Consequently, the “mystery” of the Bell states is understood to result from conservation per Information Invariance and Continuity between different reference frames of mutually complementary qubit measurements, and this maps to conservation per NPRF in spacetime. If one falsely conflates the relativity principle with the classical theory of SR, then it may seem impossible that the relativity principle resides at the foundation of non-relativisitic QM. In fact, there is nothing inherently classical or quantum about NPRF. Thus, the axiomatic reconstructions of QM have succeeded in producing a principle account of QM that reveals as much about Nature as the postulates of SR.

Highlights

  • Feynman famously said, “I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics” [1]

  • This is in total analogy to the Lorentz transformations of special relativity (SR) being based on the relativity principle as it pertains to the invariant measurement of the speed of light c

  • We introduce only the key informationtheoretic concepts associated with the qubit in the reconstructions of quantum mechanics (QM), as required to make our argument to the physicist interested in foundations of QM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

“I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics” [1]. “Maxwellian physicists were ready to abandon the relativity of motion principle” [45] and even “Einstein was willing to sacrifice the greatest success of 19th century physics, Maxwell’s theory, seeking to replace it by one conforming to an emission theory of light, as the classical, Galilean kinematics demanded” before realizing that such an emission theory would not work [43] Concerning his decision to produce a principle explanation instead of a constructive explanation for time dilation and length contraction, Einstein writes [52]: By and by I despaired of the possibility of discovering the true laws by means of constructive efforts based on known facts.

The Qubit and NPRF
Planck’s Constant and Spin
Implication for Entanglement via the Bell States
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call