"No One Needs to be Forced": Qualitative Insights on Competing Priorities between Antiretroviral Therapy and Reproductive Health Planning during the Dolutegravir Rollout.

Abstract

Potential associations between periconception dolutegravir (DTG) exposure and neural tube defects (NTDs) reported in 2018 caused shifting international and national antiretroviral treatment (ART) guidelines. They sometimes required women to use contraception prior to initiating DTG. To better understand the tensions between ART and family planning (FP) choices, and explore the decision-making processes of women living with HIV (WLHIV) and their healthcare providers (HCPs) employed, we conducted interviews with WLHIV exposed to DTG and their providers in western Kenya from July 2019 to August 2020. For the interviews with WLHIV, we sampled women at varying ages who either continued using DTG, switched to a different ART, or became pregnant while using DTG. We utilized inductive coding and thematic analysis. We conducted 44 interviews with WLHIV and 10 with providers. We found four dominant themes: (1) a range of attitudes about birth defects, (2) nuanced knowledge of DTG and its potential risk of birth defects, (3) significant tensions at the intersection of DTG and FP use with varying priorities amongst WLHIV and their providers for navigating the tensions, and (4) WLHIV desiring autonomy, and provider support for this, in such decision-making. Variations in beliefs were noted between WLHIV and HCPs. WLHIV highlighted the impact of community and social beliefs when discussing their attitudes while HCPs generally reported more medicalized views towards DTG utilization, potential adverse outcomes, and FP selection. Decisions pertaining to ART and FP selection are complex, and HIV treatment guidelines need to better support women's agency and reproductive health justice.