Abstract

The Asian clam (Corbicula fluminea) is one of the rapidly spreading, very successful aquatic invasive species, which has become established widely in many parts of the world. Its spread is assumed to be by both passive and active dispersal. However, the importance of active pedal movement in dispersal is hardly known. Since there was no direct evidence of this phenomenon, field observations were combined with laboratory experiments to find out if the clams move upstream actively, and how this is affected by the quality of the substrate, the density of the clams, and the water velocity. Field observations were conducted at a small watercourse with no waterborne transport. Experiments were done in an indoor artificial stream system, where the distances moved by adult clams were measured via digital image analysis. Substrate grain size, starting density of clams, and water velocity significantly affected clam movement. Fine grain sediment and slow flow velocity both facilitated spread, while there was no clear pattern of density-dependent dispersal. Also, we found no clear preference for either upstream or downstream movement. The maximum distance moved in the lab experiments predicts no more than 0.15 km/y active pedal movement in an upstream direction, while our field observations detected a much faster (0.5–11 km/y) upstream movement, which might be explained by passive dispersal, such as via human transport and ecto- or endozoochory. Overall, it seems that active movement of the species cannot read to long-distance migration.

Highlights

  • Biotic invasion is considered one of the top drivers of global biodiversity loss (Nentwig et al 2018)

  • C. fluminea was absent from Lapancsa in 2010, absent from Villany in 2013, and no specimens were detected at Borjad in 2016

  • The influence of C. fluminea on aquatic ecosystems is inconsistent, but as a non-indigenous species, disentangling the processes behind its Natural spread is generally associated with downstream passive dispersal in the water current (Prezant and Chalermwat 1984)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biotic invasion is considered one of the top drivers of global biodiversity loss (Nentwig et al 2018). Corbicula fluminea can alter trophic and nutrient dynamics of aquatic systems (Sousa et al 2008) and can have a negative impact on the entire native macroinvertebrate community (Schmidlin et al 2012). It can act as an ecological engineer by leaving tons of empty shells behind after death of the animals, forming a thick layer of shells and creating a new microhabitat that covers the original microhabitat and renders its structure and composition uniform (Strayer and Malcom 2007; Sousa et al 2009). The impact of macrofouling on human environments by C. fluminea can be substantial (Darrigran 2002)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call