Abstract

“Subsequent search misses” represent a decrease in accuracy at detecting a second target in a visual search task. In this study, we tested the possibility to modulate this effect via inhibition of the right posterior parietal cortex trough transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The target stimuli were T-shapes presented among L-shaped distractors. The participant’s task was to detect targets or to report their absence. For each trial, targets could be represented by one high-salient target, one low-salient target, two different targets (one high salient and one low salient), two high salient targets, two low salient targets, or no targets at all (catch-trials). Offline tDCS was applied over the right (target site) or left (control site) posterior parietal cortex. Sham stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex was included as a control (placebo). Stimulation lasted for 10 min. Afterward, participants were asked to perform the experiment. Our findings suggest that stimulation did not modulate any of the task conditions, suggesting potential limitation of the study: either tDCS was not enough powerful to modulate the task performance or the task was too easy to be modulated by stimulation.

Highlights

  • Visual search for targets among distractors is a task that people face in everyday life

  • There are obvious differences in the methods used to identify the typical effects of the “attentional blink” and the SSM (RSVP and visual search task), both methods are focused on the similar process - the omission of the second target after detecting or identifying the first one

  • We investigated the involvement of the right PPC in the SSM phenomenon by using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Visual search for targets among distractors is a task that people face in everyday life. The retention of these features in the WM can shift the attention to other stimuli that have perceptual or categorical features similar to the first stimulus This idea is consistent with the finding of Cain et al (2014), which revealed that several single-target search tasks effectively free the WM resources used by the first found target and reduce the amplitude of the SSM. There are obvious differences in the methods used to identify the typical effects of the “attentional blink” and the SSM (RSVP and visual search task), both methods are focused on the similar process - the omission of the second target after detecting or identifying the first one. We expected tDCS to modulate the SSM effect in 1 high-salient + 1 low-salient target condition

Participants
Procedure
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call