Abstract

BackgroundAlthough associated adverse pregnancy outcomes, no international or Swedish consensus exists that identifies a cut-off value or what screening method to use for definition of gestational diabetes mellitus. This study investigates the following: i) guidelines for screening of GDM; ii) background and risk factors for GDM and selection to OGTT; and iii) pregnancy outcomes in relation to GDM, screening regimes and levels of OGTT 2 hour glucose values.MethodsThis cross-sectional and population-based study uses data from the Swedish Maternal Health Care Register (MHCR) (2011 and 2012) combined with guidelines for GDM screening (2011–2012) from each Maternal Health Care Area (MHCA) in Sweden. The sample consisted of 184,183 women: 88,140 in 2011 and 96,043 in 2012. Chi-square and two independent samples t-tests were used. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsFour screening regimes of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (75 g of glucose) were used: A) universal screening with a 2-hour cut-off value of 10.0 mmol/L; B) selective screening with a 2-hour cut-off value of 8.9 mmol/L; C) selective screening with a 2-hour cut-off value of 10.0 mmol/L; and D) selective screening with a 2-hour cut-off value of 12.2 mmol/L. The highest prevalence of GDM (2.9%) was found with a 2-hour cut-off value of 8.9 mmol/L when selective screening was applied. Unemployment and low educational level were associated with an increased risk of GDM. The OR was 4.14 (CI 95%: 3.81-4.50) for GDM in obese women compared to women with BMI <30 kg/m2. Women with non-Nordic origin presented a more than doubled risk for GDM compared to women with Nordic origin (OR = 2.24; CI 95%: 2.06-2.43). Increasing OGTT values were associated with increasing risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes.ConclusionsThere was no consensus regarding screening regimes for GDM from 2011 through 2012 when four different regimes were applied in Sweden. Increasing levels of OGTT 2-hour glucose values were strongly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Based on these findings, we suggest that Sweden adopts the recent recommendations of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) concerning the performance of OGTT and the diagnostic criteria for GDM.

Highlights

  • Associated adverse pregnancy outcomes, no international or Swedish consensus exists that identifies a cut-off value or what screening method to use for definition of gestational diabetes mellitus

  • Regarding performed oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 2011 vs. 2012 significant p-values were found for the variables weight (p = 0.001), Body mass index (BMI) (0.001), educational level (p = 0.003), employment status (p = 0.012), number of visits to Antenatal care (ANC) (p = 0.011), SRH (p = 0.001), reported smoking three months before pregnancy (p = 0.001), and reported smoking at first visit (p = 0.001)

  • We suggest that older maternal age and low socioeconomic status should be considered as indicators for performance of OGTT when using a selective screening approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Associated adverse pregnancy outcomes, no international or Swedish consensus exists that identifies a cut-off value or what screening method to use for definition of gestational diabetes mellitus. Offspring of women with GDM pregnancies have increased risk of obesity, glucose intolerance, and diabetes mellitus in puberty or early adulthood, all conditions included in metabolic syndrome [8,9]. There is, no international consensus regarding how women should be screened for GDM, whether screening should be undertaken universally, or whether women who present risk factors [14] should undergo screening, i.e. selective screening. This lack of consensus persists even though it is recognized that adverse pregnancy outcomes are associated with GDM and a diagnosis of GDM results in increased medical surveillance for mother and fetus during pregnancy [15]. It is impossible to estimate the true prevalence of GDM

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call