Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to inquire into how conceptualising is done in the industrial network approach (INA).Design/methodology/approachThe description and analysis of conceptualising is based on key INA references and an example illustrating the characteristics of conceptualising in individual studies.FindingsThe paper concludes that there is an open and interactive way of conceptualising in the INA. The empirical and theoretical grounding achieved through combining concepts in individual empirical studies interplays with conceptual development in the research community over time.Research limitations/implicationsThree paradoxes are suggested for further discussion of conceptualising as a key element in theorising in the INA community.Originality/valueBy explicating how INA researchers engage in conceptualising both in individual empirical studies and as a community, the authors identify characteristics similar to the empirical phenomena in focus of the research: interaction, combining and heterogeneity of concepts.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
