Abstract
Previous behavioral and neurophysiological research has shown better memory for horizontal than for vertical locations. In these studies, participants navigated toward these locations. In the present study we investigated whether the orientation of the spatial plane per se was responsible for this difference. We thus had participants learn locations visually from a single perspective and retrieve them from multiple viewpoints. In three experiments, participants studied colored tags on a horizontally or vertically oriented board within a virtual room and recalled these locations with different layout orientations (Exp. 1) or from different room-based perspectives (Exps. 2 and 3). All experiments revealed evidence for equal recall performance in horizontal and vertical memory. In addition, the patterns for recall from different test orientations were rather similar. Consequently, our results suggest that memory is qualitatively similar for both vertical and horizontal two-dimensional locations, given that these locations are learned from a single viewpoint. Thus, prior differences in spatial memory may have originated from the structure of the space or the fact that participants navigated through it. Additionally, the strong performance advantages for perspective shifts (Exps. 2 and 3) relative to layout rotations (Exp. 1) suggest that configurational judgments are not only based on memory of the relations between target objects, but also encompass the relations between target objects and the surrounding room—for example, in the form of a memorized view.
Highlights
Previous behavioral and neurophysiological research has shown better memory for horizontal than for vertical locations
In the present study we investigated whether the horizontal advantage in spatial memory is bound to a space that was acquired through navigation, or whether it is a general property of spatial memory and can be observed in spaces that were not learned through navigation but instead were perceived from a single perspective
We analyzed the data in a 2 × 3 × 2 mixed-factors analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the within-subjects factors Plane Orientation and Test Orientation (0°, 180°, in-between board rotation), as well as the between-subjects factor Order, to investigate both of our hypotheses
Summary
Previous behavioral and neurophysiological research has shown better memory for horizontal than for vertical locations. When researchers have conducted such comparisons the results showed an advantage in memory for horizontal as compared to vertical space (see Jeffery, Jovalekic, Verriotis, & Hayman, 2013b for a review). Such a horizontal advantage in spatial memory was found only when spatial memory was acquired through navigation. The horizontal advantage in spatial memory was advocated by Jeffery et al.’s (2013b) bicoded-map hypothesis According to this hypothesis, surface-travelling mammals possess a spatio-cognitive system that is tuned to two-dimensional surface-bound navigation and treats three-dimensional space asymmetrically. Human memory seem to be exhibit greater vertical than horizontal distortions regarding the size of familiar buildings (Brandt et al, 2015)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.