Abstract

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of transition state regulator proteins is critical, since they play a pivotal role in the ability of bacteria to cope with changing environments. Although much effort has focused on their genetic characterization, little is known about their structural and functional conservation. Here we present the high resolution NMR solution structure of the N-terminal domain of the Bacillus subtilis transition state regulator Abh (AbhN), only the second such structure to date. We then compare AbhN to the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of B. subtilis AbrB (AbrBN). This is the first such comparison between two AbrB-like transition state regulators. AbhN and AbrBN are very similar, suggesting a common structural basis for their DNA binding. However, we also note subtle variances between the AbhN and AbrBN structures, which may play important roles in DNA target specificity. The results of accompanying in vitro DNA-binding studies serve to highlight binding differences between the two proteins.

Highlights

  • Understanding the molecular mechanisms of transition state regulator proteins is critical, since they play a pivotal role in the ability of bacteria to cope with changing environments

  • Bacillus subtilis responds to a multitude of environmental stimuli by using transcription factors to orchestrate gene expression patterns [1,2,3]

  • In B. subtilis, transition state regulators play an essential role in spore formation and survival of the cell [12]

Read more

Summary

NMR Structure of AbhN and Comparison with AbrBN

FIRST INSIGHTS INTO THE DNA BINDING PROMISCUITY AND SPECIFICITY OF AbrB-LIKE TRANSITION STATE REGULATOR PROTEINS*. We compare AbhN to the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of B. subtilis AbrB (AbrBN) This is the first such comparison between two AbrB-like transition state regulators. We present the high resolution NMR solution structure of AbhN, the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of the transition state regulator Abh from B. subtilis (AbhN; residues 1–54) (Protein Data Bank code 2FY9). These conserved conformations afford different transition state regulators the ability to bind structurally related subsets of DNA. Abh seemingly possesses a greater propensity to bind nonspecifically to DNA sequences than does AbrB This supports a model in which different transition state regulators differentiate between subsets of DNA structures [27]

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Hydrogen exchange experiments were performed by running
RESULTS
Hydrogen bonds
Findings
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.