Abstract
Furrow irrigation poses particular challenges for optimizing sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) nitrogen uptake. The purpose of this research was to evaluate six N sources available to sugarbeet producers, including three dry products (urea and two enhanced-efficiency urea products) and three fluid products [ureaammonium-nitrate (UAN)-32 and two enhanced-efficiency fluid products]. Products were evaluated at two application timings (split preplant and side dress, and all preplant) and two rates (typical grower rate and soil-test-based rate). Results show subtle but possibly economically important differences in sugar yield, with knife-injected fluid UAN-based products performing best. These fluid N sources performed as well at soil-test-based N rates as at the higher N rates.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
