Abstract

Hyperpolarization-activated non-specific cation-permeable channels (HCN) mediate I(H) currents, which are modulated by cGMP and cAMP and by nitric oxide (NO) signalling. Channel properties depend upon subunit composition (HCN1-4 and accessory subunits) as demonstrated in expression systems, but physiological relevance requires investigation in native neurons with intact intracellular signalling. Here we use the superior olivary complex (SOC), which exhibits a distinctive pattern of HCN1 and HCN2 expression, to investigate NO modulation of the respective I(H) currents, and compare properties in wild-type and HCN1 knockout mice. The medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) expresses HCN2 subunits exclusively, and sends inhibitory projections to the medial and lateral superior olives (MSO, LSO) and the superior paraolivary nucleus (SPN). In contrast to the MNTB, these target nuclei possess an I(H) with fast kinetics, and they express HCN1 subunits. NO is generated in the SOC following synaptic activity and here we show that NO selectively suppresses HCN1, while enhancing IH mediated by HCN2 subunits. NO hyperpolarizes the half-activation of HCN1-mediated currents and slows the kinetics of native IH currents in the MSO, LSO and SPN. This modulation was independent of cGMP and absent in transgenic mice lacking HCN1. Independently, NO signalling depolarizes the half-activation of HCN2-mediated I(H) currents in a cGMP-dependent manner. Thus, NO selectively suppresses fast HCN1-mediated I(H) and facilitates a slow HCN2-mediated I(H) , so generating a spectrum of modulation, dependent on the local expression of HCN1 and/or HCN2.

Highlights

  • IntroductionAll four subunits are expressed in the brain, but expression studies show they that differ in their activation kinetics (HCN1: fast, HCN2: intermediate, HCN3&4: slow), their voltagedependent activation (half-activation voltages for HCN1: -70mV, HCN2: -95mV, HCN3: -85mV, HCN4: -100mV) and their depolarizing shift in activation voltage in response to cyclic nucleotide modulation (HCN2&4: most sensitive, HCN1&3: less sensitive) (Robinson & Siegelbaum, 2003; Biel et al, 2009; Wahl-Schott & Biel, 2009; Shah, 2014)

  • HCN1 immunofluorescence was intense in cell bodies and fibres that were predominant in those nuclei with the fastest IH (MSO and LSO), moderate in superior paraolivary nucleus (SPN) and absent where IH exhibits slow kinetics (MNTB)

  • The LSO and SPN were immunopositive for HCN2, but unlike in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB), HCN2 labelling in LSO and SPN was concentrated in the neuropil

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All four subunits are expressed in the brain, but expression studies show they that differ in their activation kinetics (HCN1: fast, HCN2: intermediate, HCN3&4: slow), their voltagedependent activation (half-activation voltages for HCN1: -70mV, HCN2: -95mV, HCN3: -85mV, HCN4: -100mV) and their depolarizing shift in activation voltage in response to cyclic nucleotide modulation (HCN2&4: most sensitive, HCN1&3: less sensitive) (Robinson & Siegelbaum, 2003; Biel et al, 2009; Wahl-Schott & Biel, 2009; Shah, 2014) These properties have often been determined in cell expression systems, but there is increasing evidence that the appropriate intracellular machinery (including accessory subunits, and local kinase and phosphatase activity) contributes to shaping the characteristics of IH currents in native neurons (Santoro et al, 2009; Wahl-Schott & Biel, 2009). The large amplitude of IH currents (surpassing that of IH currents in, for example, CA1 neurons by 10-fold) increases the reliability of observing modulatory effects in these neurons, and use of HCN1-KO mice allowed differentiation between NO effects on HCN1 and HCN2 subunits

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call